<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336121</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confiscating imported goods under the EOU scheme, demanding customs duty and penalties, confiscating trucks, and imposing penalties on individuals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for allowing cross-examination and addressing the issue of alleged fulfillment of export obligations. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within three months, stressing the importance of natural justice principles in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:35:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336121</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confiscating imported goods under the EOU scheme, demanding customs duty and penalties, confiscating trucks, and imposing penalties on individuals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for allowing cross-examination and addressing the issue of alleged fulfillment of export obligations. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within three months, stressing the importance of natural justice principles in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>