<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 747 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting certain additions under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act and upholding the rejection of additional evidence under Rule 46A. Additionally, the Tribunal found the estimation of net profit and rejection of the Profit and Loss Account for the 2009-10 assessment year unjustified, leading to the deletion of the added amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:55:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 747 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting certain additions under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act and upholding the rejection of additional evidence under Rule 46A. Additionally, the Tribunal found the estimation of net profit and rejection of the Profit and Loss Account for the 2009-10 assessment year unjustified, leading to the deletion of the added amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>