<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 734 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for re-examination of documents provided by the appellant and any additional submissions. The original authority was directed to decide on the refund claim considering Tribunal judgments referenced by the appellant, ensuring compliance with natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a reasoned decision within three months of receiving the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 734 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for re-examination of documents provided by the appellant and any additional submissions. The original authority was directed to decide on the refund claim considering Tribunal judgments referenced by the appellant, ensuring compliance with natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a reasoned decision within three months of receiving the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>