<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 733 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax on transportation expenses from Nepal to their factory. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellants were not considered recipients of GTA services as they did not directly engage the transporters. Previous decisions and the nature of the contract between the appellants and Nepalese suppliers supported this finding. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed all appeals with consequential relief, following precedent set in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 733 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were not liable to pay service tax on transportation expenses from Nepal to their factory. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellants were not considered recipients of GTA services as they did not directly engage the transporters. Previous decisions and the nature of the contract between the appellants and Nepalese suppliers supported this finding. The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed all appeals with consequential relief, following precedent set in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>