https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336081 The Tribunal confirmed a duty of Rs. 61,94,676 against the appellant due to the denial of credit on inputs, specifically polypropylene chips. The appellant argued they were entitled to credit as they had paid duty on the inputs, referencing a previous Tribunal decision. The Tribunal noted no reassessment against the supplier had been conducted and held that the credit of duty paid on the inputs could not be denied to the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:41:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336081 The Tribunal confirmed a duty of Rs. 61,94,676 against the appellant due to the denial of credit on inputs, specifically polypropylene chips. The appellant argued they were entitled to credit as they had paid duty on the inputs, referencing a previous Tribunal decision. The Tribunal noted no reassessment against the supplier had been conducted and held that the credit of duty paid on the inputs could not be denied to the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336081