<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 718 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336073</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the demand for credit on MS Angled, Plates, Channels, etc., as capital goods was unsustainable. The items were deemed eligible for credit as they were used to provide structural support to capital goods, as evidenced by previous legal precedents. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 718 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336073</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the demand for credit on MS Angled, Plates, Channels, etc., as capital goods was unsustainable. The items were deemed eligible for credit as they were used to provide structural support to capital goods, as evidenced by previous legal precedents. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>