https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336069 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for re-examination due to the overlooked crucial aspect that led to double taxation for the appellant. The authority was directed to consider the appellant's submissions, examine evidence, and issue a proper order within three months, providing a reasonable opportunity for defense. Emphasizing the need for a swift resolution, the Tribunal urged a prompt notice for resolution, recording pleadings, considering evidence, and passing a reasoned order to ensure fairness and adherence to legal principles, addressing the issue of disputed Cenvat credit diligently and fairly. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:14:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336069 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for re-examination due to the overlooked crucial aspect that led to double taxation for the appellant. The authority was directed to consider the appellant's submissions, examine evidence, and issue a proper order within three months, providing a reasonable opportunity for defense. Emphasizing the need for a swift resolution, the Tribunal urged a prompt notice for resolution, recording pleadings, considering evidence, and passing a reasoned order to ensure fairness and adherence to legal principles, addressing the issue of disputed Cenvat credit diligently and fairly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336069