<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 707 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against Orders-in-Appeal dated 11/09/1996 by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai, as the amount involved was below the threshold limit of Rs. 50,000 specified under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal exercised its discretion to refuse admission based on the Second proviso to Section 35B, without delving into the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 707 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against Orders-in-Appeal dated 11/09/1996 by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai, as the amount involved was below the threshold limit of Rs. 50,000 specified under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal exercised its discretion to refuse admission based on the Second proviso to Section 35B, without delving into the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>