<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 703 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing both appeals based on the proper interpretation of the notification&#039;s conditions and the certification of goods imported for the nuclear project. The judgment emphasized that the focus was on the nature and use of the goods rather than the importer, ensuring the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the exemption benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 703 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing both appeals based on the proper interpretation of the notification&#039;s conditions and the certification of goods imported for the nuclear project. The judgment emphasized that the focus was on the nature and use of the goods rather than the importer, ensuring the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the exemption benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>