<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 701 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to promptly refund amounts or obtain stay orders, criticizing delays in implementing orders despite no stay from higher courts. The Tribunal emphasized the binding effect of its orders and urged the Revenue to act promptly to avoid interest liabilities and serve justice. The Revenue was given a deadline to secure a stay order or implement the Tribunal&#039;s orders to ensure timely action and prevent further delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 701 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to promptly refund amounts or obtain stay orders, criticizing delays in implementing orders despite no stay from higher courts. The Tribunal emphasized the binding effect of its orders and urged the Revenue to act promptly to avoid interest liabilities and serve justice. The Revenue was given a deadline to secure a stay order or implement the Tribunal&#039;s orders to ensure timely action and prevent further delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>