https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336053 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating it was not the suitable forum for resolving the disputes concerning the validity of the petitioner's title over the cargo, the legality of amending the bill of lading, and jurisdiction issues. The court advised the parties to seek resolution through the adjudicating authority under the Customs Act or other appropriate legal avenues, emphasizing that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used for settling private disputes or contractual rights. en-us Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336053 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating it was not the suitable forum for resolving the disputes concerning the validity of the petitioner's title over the cargo, the legality of amending the bill of lading, and jurisdiction issues. The court advised the parties to seek resolution through the adjudicating authority under the Customs Act or other appropriate legal avenues, emphasizing that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used for settling private disputes or contractual rights. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336053