https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6075 A question concerning unaccounted receipts, on-money, and the Assessing Officer's burden was held to be a referable question requiring High Court examination. The Supreme Court declined to express any view on the merits, but found that the Tribunal's order raised an issue that should have been referred for consideration. The refusal to call for a reference was therefore set aside in part, and the specified question was directed to be referred to the High Court. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6075 A question concerning unaccounted receipts, on-money, and the Assessing Officer's burden was held to be a referable question requiring High Court examination. The Supreme Court declined to express any view on the merits, but found that the Tribunal's order raised an issue that should have been referred for consideration. The refusal to call for a reference was therefore set aside in part, and the specified question was directed to be referred to the High Court. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6075