<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188755</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court&#039;s ruling declaring the state&#039;s special quota policy for children/wards of police personnel as unconstitutional. The Court emphasized that since there was no challenge to the policy&#039;s validity, the High Court erred in its decision. The applicant&#039;s failure in tests was the basis for dismissal, and the Court highlighted the lack of challenge to the policy itself during the proceedings. The Court did not express an opinion on the policy&#039;s validity but affirmed the lack of merit in the applicant&#039;s case. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188755</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court&#039;s ruling declaring the state&#039;s special quota policy for children/wards of police personnel as unconstitutional. The Court emphasized that since there was no challenge to the policy&#039;s validity, the High Court erred in its decision. The applicant&#039;s failure in tests was the basis for dismissal, and the Court highlighted the lack of challenge to the policy itself during the proceedings. The Court did not express an opinion on the policy&#039;s validity but affirmed the lack of merit in the applicant&#039;s case. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>