https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188754 A common preliminary screening ratio for shortlisting candidates was upheld as a permissible recruitment method because it operated only as an eligibility filter and did not final merit or appointment. Articles 15 and 16 were treated as enabling provisions, not a source of enforceable rights to demand community-wise shortlisting at the screening stage, and reservation continued to apply within the overall recruitment framework. The Public Service Commission was held to have locus standi because the impugned judgment directly set aside its recruitment process. The common screening procedure was therefore restored, and the contrary view of the High Court was set aside. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188754 A common preliminary screening ratio for shortlisting candidates was upheld as a permissible recruitment method because it operated only as an eligibility filter and did not final merit or appointment. Articles 15 and 16 were treated as enabling provisions, not a source of enforceable rights to demand community-wise shortlisting at the screening stage, and reservation continued to apply within the overall recruitment framework. The Public Service Commission was held to have locus standi because the impugned judgment directly set aside its recruitment process. The common screening procedure was therefore restored, and the contrary view of the High Court was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188754