<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188746</link>
    <description>Section 4(9) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 was construed purposively to cover not only a separate adjoining plot but also vacant land forming part of the same plot on which a building stands. The provision was read with the Act&#039;s object of limiting vacant urban land while preserving reasonable beneficial enjoyment of land retained with the holder. For ceiling computation, the built-up area and the permissible appurtenant/open area allowed under building regulations must be excluded, and only the remaining land is tested against the ceiling limit. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of surplus land on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188746</link>
      <description>Section 4(9) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 was construed purposively to cover not only a separate adjoining plot but also vacant land forming part of the same plot on which a building stands. The provision was read with the Act&#039;s object of limiting vacant urban land while preserving reasonable beneficial enjoyment of land retained with the holder. For ceiling computation, the built-up area and the permissible appurtenant/open area allowed under building regulations must be excluded, and only the remaining land is tested against the ceiling limit. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of surplus land on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>