<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 762 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188745</link>
    <description>HC held that, for deduction u/s 80IA relating to a captive power plant (CPP) supplying electricity to the assessee&#039;s general unit, the &quot;market value&quot; under s.80IA(8) is the tariff at which the State Electricity Board supplies electricity to its consumers. The inclusion of electricity duty (8 paise per unit) in the rate of Rs. 5.40 per unit does not alter the market value, as the consumer&#039;s effective price is Rs. 5.40 and the subsequent statutory remittance to Government is irrelevant for determining market value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the assessee&#039;s computation on this ground was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 762 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188745</link>
      <description>HC held that, for deduction u/s 80IA relating to a captive power plant (CPP) supplying electricity to the assessee&#039;s general unit, the &quot;market value&quot; under s.80IA(8) is the tariff at which the State Electricity Board supplies electricity to its consumers. The inclusion of electricity duty (8 paise per unit) in the rate of Rs. 5.40 per unit does not alter the market value, as the consumer&#039;s effective price is Rs. 5.40 and the subsequent statutory remittance to Government is irrelevant for determining market value. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the assessee&#039;s computation on this ground was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>