<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1046 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</link>
    <description>An irrevocable agreement to sell an undivided share in immovable property, coupled with consideration receipts, powers of attorney, indemnity bonds and part-performance rights, constituted transfer for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v) in assessment year 2006-07, not 2007-08, because the later registered sale deed did not postpone the date of transfer. On that basis, the same capital gains having already been disclosed and assessed in scrutiny for the earlier year, the reopening under section 147 lacked a bona fide basis of escapement and could not be sustained. The reassessment was therefore invalid and the assessee obtained full relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1046 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</link>
      <description>An irrevocable agreement to sell an undivided share in immovable property, coupled with consideration receipts, powers of attorney, indemnity bonds and part-performance rights, constituted transfer for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v) in assessment year 2006-07, not 2007-08, because the later registered sale deed did not postpone the date of transfer. On that basis, the same capital gains having already been disclosed and assessed in scrutiny for the earlier year, the reopening under section 147 lacked a bona fide basis of escapement and could not be sustained. The reassessment was therefore invalid and the assessee obtained full relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>