<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1046 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the capital gains were correctly offered in AY 2006-07. The re-opening of the assessment for AY 2007-08 was deemed unjustified, as the income had already been disclosed and assessed in the previous year. The initiation of penalty proceedings was considered premature and rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1046 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the capital gains were correctly offered in AY 2006-07. The re-opening of the assessment for AY 2007-08 was deemed unjustified, as the income had already been disclosed and assessed in the previous year. The initiation of penalty proceedings was considered premature and rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>