https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188720 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a dispute over the grant of interest on a refund of excess duty paid. Despite initial denial based on unjust enrichment grounds, the petitioner eventually received the refund amount after appeals. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest on the refund from June 2007 until the actual refund date in 2009. The judgment emphasizes the significance of submitting supporting documents to substantiate refund claims and the right to interest as per statutory provisions. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188720 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a dispute over the grant of interest on a refund of excess duty paid. Despite initial denial based on unjust enrichment grounds, the petitioner eventually received the refund amount after appeals. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to interest on the refund from June 2007 until the actual refund date in 2009. The judgment emphasizes the significance of submitting supporting documents to substantiate refund claims and the right to interest as per statutory provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188720