<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1122 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188716</link>
    <description>The court upheld the revenue&#039;s decision, finding the appellant knowingly involved in availing credit twice, rejecting the claim of absence of mens rea. The court dismissed the writ appeal without costs, supporting the imposition of restrictions based on the deliberate conduct of the assessee in splitting credit entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1122 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188716</link>
      <description>The court upheld the revenue&#039;s decision, finding the appellant knowingly involved in availing credit twice, rejecting the claim of absence of mens rea. The court dismissed the writ appeal without costs, supporting the imposition of restrictions based on the deliberate conduct of the assessee in splitting credit entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>