<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 669 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336024</link>
    <description>The appellant contested penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for not paying service tax on Renting of Immovable Property services. The levy of service tax was deemed ultra vires. The appellant paid the tax with interest before the show cause notice. Penalty under Section 76 was not imposed, and the appeal was disposed of without penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 669 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336024</link>
      <description>The appellant contested penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for not paying service tax on Renting of Immovable Property services. The levy of service tax was deemed ultra vires. The appellant paid the tax with interest before the show cause notice. Penalty under Section 76 was not imposed, and the appeal was disposed of without penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>