<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 667 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the composite contract for the auto LPG dispensing System on a turnkey basis could not be artificially split for Service Tax purposes. The decision was based on legal precedents and established law regarding the taxation of work contracts involving multiple services before a specific date. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 667 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the composite contract for the auto LPG dispensing System on a turnkey basis could not be artificially split for Service Tax purposes. The decision was based on legal precedents and established law regarding the taxation of work contracts involving multiple services before a specific date. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>