<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 664 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336019</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 were deleted by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act was extended to the respondent, a contractor providing services. The Commissioner accepted that the respondent had paid tax before adjudication, showing reasonable cause for non-deposit of Service Tax, and was unaware of the tax obligations. The Tribunal, following a High Court ruling, emphasized the lack of willful misstatement or fraud and upheld the deletion of the penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to consequential benefits under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 664 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336019</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 were deleted by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act was extended to the respondent, a contractor providing services. The Commissioner accepted that the respondent had paid tax before adjudication, showing reasonable cause for non-deposit of Service Tax, and was unaware of the tax obligations. The Tribunal, following a High Court ruling, emphasized the lack of willful misstatement or fraud and upheld the deletion of the penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to consequential benefits under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>