<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as no penalty was imposed due to the tribunal finding no fraud or wilful misstatement in the payment of service tax on GTA service under reverse charge mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as no penalty was imposed due to the tribunal finding no fraud or wilful misstatement in the payment of service tax on GTA service under reverse charge mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>