<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</link>
    <description>Where service tax and interest are paid before issuance of the show cause notice, and no fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax is established, Section 73(3) bars further penalty proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, penalty under Sections 76 and 78 was held unsustainable, and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</link>
      <description>Where service tax and interest are paid before issuance of the show cause notice, and no fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax is established, Section 73(3) bars further penalty proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, penalty under Sections 76 and 78 was held unsustainable, and the penalty order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>