<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 660 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336015</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim for January and February 2011. The Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision to disallow the refund based on a time limit issue was deemed unjustified as the claims were found to be filed within the prescribed time under Notification No. 17/2011-ST. The appellant successfully argued that the claims should be considered under this notification, which had a one-year time limit, rather than under Notification No. 9/2009-ST with a shorter time frame. Consequently, the appellant was declared eligible for the refund with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 660 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336015</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim for January and February 2011. The Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision to disallow the refund based on a time limit issue was deemed unjustified as the claims were found to be filed within the prescribed time under Notification No. 17/2011-ST. The appellant successfully argued that the claims should be considered under this notification, which had a one-year time limit, rather than under Notification No. 9/2009-ST with a shorter time frame. Consequently, the appellant was declared eligible for the refund with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>