https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336012 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants regarding the timely payment of central excise duty for May 2011. The appellants' use of cenvat credit to discharge duty during a default period was deemed permissible based on precedents such as Steel Tubes of India Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Indore and Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. UOI. The Tribunal found no merit in the original authority's decision, citing the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) and affirmed the acceptability of duty payment through cenvat credit during a default period, ultimately setting aside the impugned order. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:47:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336012 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants regarding the timely payment of central excise duty for May 2011. The appellants' use of cenvat credit to discharge duty during a default period was deemed permissible based on precedents such as Steel Tubes of India Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Indore and Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. UOI. The Tribunal found no merit in the original authority's decision, citing the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A) and affirmed the acceptability of duty payment through cenvat credit during a default period, ultimately setting aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336012