https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336005 The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit due to an alleged improper document. The judge held that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit based on invoices issued by the manufacturer of inputs, as per Rule 9 (1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Since the appellant had followed this rule, the provisions of Rule 9 (1) (e) (f) (g) were found inapplicable. Consequently, the impugned order denying Cenvat credit was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336005 The appellant successfully appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit due to an alleged improper document. The judge held that the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit based on invoices issued by the manufacturer of inputs, as per Rule 9 (1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Since the appellant had followed this rule, the provisions of Rule 9 (1) (e) (f) (g) were found inapplicable. Consequently, the impugned order denying Cenvat credit was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336005