https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336001 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals concerning the non-payment of differential duty on "Tapioca Sago" as the appellants had paid their duty liabilities with interest before the issuance of Show Cause Notices. The Tribunal found the penalties imposed excessive, considering the appellants' proactive actions and the applicability of Section 11(2B) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing the unjustified nature of the penalties and the unnecessary issuance of SCNs in this case. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336001 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals concerning the non-payment of differential duty on "Tapioca Sago" as the appellants had paid their duty liabilities with interest before the issuance of Show Cause Notices. The Tribunal found the penalties imposed excessive, considering the appellants' proactive actions and the applicability of Section 11(2B) of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing the unjustified nature of the penalties and the unnecessary issuance of SCNs in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336001