https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335990 The Tribunal found that the appellant did not sublet their CHA license as alleged by the Commissioner of Customs. Consequently, the order revoking the license and forfeiting the security deposit was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that since the main charge of subletting was not proven, the violations of other regulations were also not sustained. The appeal was allowed, and the department's case for revocation of the license was deemed unsustainable. en-us Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335990 The Tribunal found that the appellant did not sublet their CHA license as alleged by the Commissioner of Customs. Consequently, the order revoking the license and forfeiting the security deposit was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that since the main charge of subletting was not proven, the violations of other regulations were also not sustained. The appeal was allowed, and the department's case for revocation of the license was deemed unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335990