<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 576 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188704</link>
    <description>A compromise recorded in execution proceedings is legally permissible and may be enforced by the executing court. The settlement must be read as a whole to determine its true intent and effect. On that construction, the balance payable under the execution compromise, with interest, remained within the framework of the original decree, and the amount earlier waived did not crystallise into a separate decree. Default in instalment payment therefore did not revive the abandoned claim, especially where the later orders extending time had attained finality and the compromise had been acted upon by payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 18:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 576 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188704</link>
      <description>A compromise recorded in execution proceedings is legally permissible and may be enforced by the executing court. The settlement must be read as a whole to determine its true intent and effect. On that construction, the balance payable under the execution compromise, with interest, remained within the framework of the original decree, and the amount earlier waived did not crystallise into a separate decree. Default in instalment payment therefore did not revive the abandoned claim, especially where the later orders extending time had attained finality and the compromise had been acted upon by payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>