<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 787 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188699</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals by recognizing the annealing process as a manufacturing activity eligible for deduction under section 80-IA. The issue of higher depreciation on furnaces was remanded for further verification. Unpressed grounds were dismissed, and the appeal regarding motor car expenses and depreciation was partially allowed, with the tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to 1/5th of the expenses and depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 787 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188699</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals by recognizing the annealing process as a manufacturing activity eligible for deduction under section 80-IA. The issue of higher depreciation on furnaces was remanded for further verification. Unpressed grounds were dismissed, and the appeal regarding motor car expenses and depreciation was partially allowed, with the tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to 1/5th of the expenses and depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>