<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, allowing the appeal as sub-letting hoardings to advertising agencies for displaying advertisements did not constitute providing services under the Finance Act. The decision emphasized interpreting definitions under the Act and relied on precedent to determine the appellant&#039;s classification as an advertising agency. The analysis focused on the nature of services provided and the application of legal provisions, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, allowing the appeal as sub-letting hoardings to advertising agencies for displaying advertisements did not constitute providing services under the Finance Act. The decision emphasized interpreting definitions under the Act and relied on precedent to determine the appellant&#039;s classification as an advertising agency. The analysis focused on the nature of services provided and the application of legal provisions, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>