<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 622 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) wrongly assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 as the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT&#039;s order, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 622 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) wrongly assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 as the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT&#039;s order, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment order. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>