<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 616 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335971</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of factual details over legal precedents in objections. It found the respondent&#039;s actions compliant with legal requirements and dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 616 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335971</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of factual details over legal precedents in objections. It found the respondent&#039;s actions compliant with legal requirements and dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>