<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 613 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the assessee&#039;s books of account under section 145(3) of the I.T. Act. It directed the application of a net profit rate of 9.75% with depreciation and interest included. The treatment of interest on FDR &amp;amp; NSC was remanded to the AO for verification. The disallowance of sales and administrative expenses was reduced to 10%. The trading addition in the petrol pump account was deleted. The addition u/s 69B was reinstated based on the Valuation Officer&#039;s report. The addition of unexplained cash deposits was modified for verification in the relevant assessment year. The treatment of sales tax refund was remanded for reconsideration by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 613 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the assessee&#039;s books of account under section 145(3) of the I.T. Act. It directed the application of a net profit rate of 9.75% with depreciation and interest included. The treatment of interest on FDR &amp;amp; NSC was remanded to the AO for verification. The disallowance of sales and administrative expenses was reduced to 10%. The trading addition in the petrol pump account was deleted. The addition u/s 69B was reinstated based on the Valuation Officer&#039;s report. The addition of unexplained cash deposits was modified for verification in the relevant assessment year. The treatment of sales tax refund was remanded for reconsideration by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>