<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 608 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the AO to apply the peak credit theory for undisclosed debtors and deleting the additions for undisclosed household expenses for all years under consideration. The order was pronounced on 24/11/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 608 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, directing the AO to apply the peak credit theory for undisclosed debtors and deleting the additions for undisclosed household expenses for all years under consideration. The order was pronounced on 24/11/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>