<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 606 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation of Rs. 35.00 lacs received by the assessee on termination of a legal services agreement was a capital receipt, not assessable to income tax. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, citing legal precedents where compensation for the loss of a source of income was treated as a capital receipt. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 606 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation of Rs. 35.00 lacs received by the assessee on termination of a legal services agreement was a capital receipt, not assessable to income tax. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, citing legal precedents where compensation for the loss of a source of income was treated as a capital receipt. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>