<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 603 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of &amp;amp;8377; 9,84,842 related to services provided to an advertising agency, citing clarifications on service tax liability. The demand of &amp;amp;8377; 2,63,977 for incorrect tax calculation from gross receipts was remanded for further examination to determine if the amount already included service tax paid by clients. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:12:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 603 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of &amp;amp;8377; 9,84,842 related to services provided to an advertising agency, citing clarifications on service tax liability. The demand of &amp;amp;8377; 2,63,977 for incorrect tax calculation from gross receipts was remanded for further examination to determine if the amount already included service tax paid by clients. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>