<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 602 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335957</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal declined full waiver of pre-deposit and held that a further deposit was necessary in view of the dispute, the amount already paid, and the submissions on record. It fixed the pre-deposit at Rs. 25 lakhs, inclusive of sums already paid, and required compliance within four weeks. The interim relief was made conditional on that deposit, and non-compliance was stated to expose the appeal to dismissal under the statutory pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 602 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335957</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, the Tribunal declined full waiver of pre-deposit and held that a further deposit was necessary in view of the dispute, the amount already paid, and the submissions on record. It fixed the pre-deposit at Rs. 25 lakhs, inclusive of sums already paid, and required compliance within four weeks. The interim relief was made conditional on that deposit, and non-compliance was stated to expose the appeal to dismissal under the statutory pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>