<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335951</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the classification of services under the C &amp;amp; F agent category. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services were not classifiable under the clearing and forwarding agent category due to the lack of involvement in clearing goods. This decision entitles the appellant to consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 596 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335951</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the classification of services under the C &amp;amp; F agent category. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s services were not classifiable under the clearing and forwarding agent category due to the lack of involvement in clearing goods. This decision entitles the appellant to consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>