<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6053</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in favor of the assessee. The reimbursement of warehouse expenses for tea storage by the agent qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the maintenance of the warehouse for sales promotion outside India by the assessee met the criteria for eligibility, even though the warehouse was operated by the agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6053</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in favor of the assessee. The reimbursement of warehouse expenses for tea storage by the agent qualified for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the maintenance of the warehouse for sales promotion outside India by the assessee met the criteria for eligibility, even though the warehouse was operated by the agent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>