<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 589 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as withdrawn. The decision emphasized the lack of suppression or contumacious conduct, resulting in the dismissal of the demand and penalty related to Cenvat credit on excisable goods procured from a 100% EOU. The case highlighted the significance of proper disclosure and the absence of fraudulent intent in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 589 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as withdrawn. The decision emphasized the lack of suppression or contumacious conduct, resulting in the dismissal of the demand and penalty related to Cenvat credit on excisable goods procured from a 100% EOU. The case highlighted the significance of proper disclosure and the absence of fraudulent intent in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>