<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 585 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335940</link>
    <description>Amounts recovered towards durable and returnable packing were treated as excludible from assessable value for the period prior to 01.07.2000, so the assessee was entitled to that deduction. Penalty was not sustainable on the recorded facts and was set aside. The duty position also required fresh determination after examining the assessee&#039;s entitlement to SSI exemption, with recalculation directed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 585 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335940</link>
      <description>Amounts recovered towards durable and returnable packing were treated as excludible from assessable value for the period prior to 01.07.2000, so the assessee was entitled to that deduction. Penalty was not sustainable on the recorded facts and was set aside. The duty position also required fresh determination after examining the assessee&#039;s entitlement to SSI exemption, with recalculation directed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>