https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335939 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and holding that security services at the Cane Collection Center were eligible for Cenvat credit under the definition of input service. The Tribunal found a direct nexus between the security services and the procurement of inputs for manufacturing activities, distinguishing a previous case cited by the Revenue. As a result, the appellant was entitled to the consequential benefit as per the law, with the impugned order set aside. en-us Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335939 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and holding that security services at the Cane Collection Center were eligible for Cenvat credit under the definition of input service. The Tribunal found a direct nexus between the security services and the procurement of inputs for manufacturing activities, distinguishing a previous case cited by the Revenue. As a result, the appellant was entitled to the consequential benefit as per the law, with the impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335939