https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335936 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing detergent products. The appellant's practice of sending goods directly to a job worker for processing, as supported by precedents, was deemed compliant with Rule 4(5)(a) of the CCR, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that receiving processed goods back sufficed for credit eligibility, rejecting the Revenue's argument based on the goods not reaching the appellant's factory. The appellant was granted the cenvat credit, with the previous denial annulled, and the appeal was successful with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:24:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335936 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing detergent products. The appellant's practice of sending goods directly to a job worker for processing, as supported by precedents, was deemed compliant with Rule 4(5)(a) of the CCR, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that receiving processed goods back sufficed for credit eligibility, rejecting the Revenue's argument based on the goods not reaching the appellant's factory. The appellant was granted the cenvat credit, with the previous denial annulled, and the appeal was successful with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335936