<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified commutators under heading 85.03 instead of 85.48, based on their direct relation to providing current to a motor or drawing electric current from a generator, regardless of their ultimate use in various industries. The appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents allowed for the calculation of demand on a cum duty basis, leading to a partial success in the appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 01/12/16, with the classification of commutators under heading 85.03 being the key issue addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified commutators under heading 85.03 instead of 85.48, based on their direct relation to providing current to a motor or drawing electric current from a generator, regardless of their ultimate use in various industries. The appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents allowed for the calculation of demand on a cum duty basis, leading to a partial success in the appeal. The judgment was pronounced on 01/12/16, with the classification of commutators under heading 85.03 being the key issue addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>