<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 590 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188695</link>
    <description>Additional duty of customs equal to excise on imported natural rubber was held unsustainable because earlier decisions had already settled that such imports could be subjected only to levy by the competent authority under the Rubber Act, 1947. The Tribunal followed appellate and larger bench orders adopting the same view and treated the similar demands as not legally maintainable. The impugned demands were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 590 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188695</link>
      <description>Additional duty of customs equal to excise on imported natural rubber was held unsustainable because earlier decisions had already settled that such imports could be subjected only to levy by the competent authority under the Rubber Act, 1947. The Tribunal followed appellate and larger bench orders adopting the same view and treated the similar demands as not legally maintainable. The impugned demands were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>