https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335921 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings should not be exercised where the complaint discloses a prima facie offence and the allegations require trial-level scrutiny, especially in disputes affecting public revenue. The Court found that later developments did not justify interference at the threshold, and that the correctness of the accusations and the ingredients of the offences could not be conclusively examined in a quashing petition. It therefore declined to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings, leaving the applicant to raise all available defences before the trial forum. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335921 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings should not be exercised where the complaint discloses a prima facie offence and the allegations require trial-level scrutiny, especially in disputes affecting public revenue. The Court found that later developments did not justify interference at the threshold, and that the correctness of the accusations and the ingredients of the offences could not be conclusively examined in a quashing petition. It therefore declined to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings, leaving the applicant to raise all available defences before the trial forum. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335921