<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335919</link>
    <description>Assessment reversing input tax credit was vitiated because it was made before the time granted for objections in the show-cause notice expired and relied on grounds not disclosed in that notice. The HC held that such action breached natural justice, as the taxpayer was denied a proper opportunity to respond. It also found that the C-Forms produced by the taxpayer should have been accepted and verified before any final adverse decision was taken. The impugned assessment order was set aside, and fresh action would require a specific notice and effective hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335919</link>
      <description>Assessment reversing input tax credit was vitiated because it was made before the time granted for objections in the show-cause notice expired and relied on grounds not disclosed in that notice. The HC held that such action breached natural justice, as the taxpayer was denied a proper opportunity to respond. It also found that the C-Forms produced by the taxpayer should have been accepted and verified before any final adverse decision was taken. The impugned assessment order was set aside, and fresh action would require a specific notice and effective hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>