https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335917 A writ petition challenging possession taken after notice under the SARFAESI Act was held not maintainable because Section 17 provides an effective statutory remedy. The Court treated the post-Section 13(4) possession measure as one that can be questioned before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, including objections to the notice, possession proceedings, and the officer's authority. Applying the settled principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative remedy exists, the Court declined to entertain the petition and left the borrower to pursue relief under Section 17. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:15:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335917 A writ petition challenging possession taken after notice under the SARFAESI Act was held not maintainable because Section 17 provides an effective statutory remedy. The Court treated the post-Section 13(4) possession measure as one that can be questioned before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, including objections to the notice, possession proceedings, and the officer's authority. Applying the settled principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative remedy exists, the Court declined to entertain the petition and left the borrower to pursue relief under Section 17. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335917