<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 558 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, adjusting the trading addition and deleting the security deposit addition. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of fair assessment based on verified records and consistent practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 558 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, adjusting the trading addition and deleting the security deposit addition. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was remanded for verification, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of fair assessment based on verified records and consistent practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>